College ‘General Education’ Requirements Help Prepare Students for Citizenship — But Critics Say It’s Learning Time Taken Away From Useful Studies
College ‘General Education’ Requirements Help Prepare Students for Citizenship — But Critics Say It’s Learning Time Taken Away From Useful Studies
What do Americans think of when they hear the words “general education”?
By definition, general education covers introductory college courses in arts and humanities, social sciences, and science and mathematics. It has different names, including core curriculum or distribution requirements, depending on the college or university.
It is also sometimes called liberal education, including by the , which describes it as providing “a sense of social responsibility, as well as strong and transferable intellectual and practical skills.”
The liberal label can be fodder for conservative groups who argue that today’s into higher education’s purported left-leaning belief systems. Some other general education as a concept but want more emphasis on so-called traditional values and less on cross-cultural understanding. These initiatives position general education and college as a space for ideological battles.
As a , I know that general education was designed to provide opportunity for all students without regard for their political preferences.
The value of a college education can be shaped by political affiliation.
An Education for All
Eighty years ago, a group of Harvard University faculty created what many colleges and universities still follow as a template for general education. This plan was outlined in the book “.”
Harvard’s plan , including veterans studying under the , and others we today refer to as first generation, where neither parent had a college degree.
General education made college more accessible to students who were not becoming doctors or lawyers but who also wanted careers outside the vocational trades. It helped make college a place for educating all citizens, not just students of socioeconomic privilege.
Expanding access to higher education was central to the 1947 special report , commissioned by President Harry Truman. The goal was to provide a foundational education for all, especially in math and science. But the report, commonly known as the Truman Commission Report, also included disciplines that help students understand the world – such as writing and communication, literature, psychology and history.
The purposes of general education are central to today, views that I also hear expressed by students and parents I’ve met in my 28 years as a professor.
One view of college is of an on-campus experience that holistically prepares students to live in a functioning democracy. These benefits are seen as worth the time and costs.
The other view is of college as a sum of career-focused credentials that can begin and end anywhere, not specific to one college campus. These benefits are completely financial, to be .
Both of these views are informed by national perspectives that further divide citizens on higher education as a whole, such as Vice President that “there was a wisdom in what Richard Nixon said approximately 40, 50 years ago. He said, and I quote, ‘The professors are the enemy.’”
Both these groups of Americans, however, hope that obtaining a college degree who find employment and reach a standard of living better than their parents’ generation.
For the first group, general education is critical to developing the whole student for jobs and life. For the latter, it is an expensive obstacle to it.
Not surprisingly, these views on education and college often correspond to political party identification and whether a person attended college themselves.
A July 2023 Lumina Foundation and Gallup Poll showed that only 36% of Americans have a “great deal” of confidence in higher education, with between the 20% of Republicans who have this confidence, the 56% of Democrats and the 35% of independents who have it. There are also measurable differences between those who have earned a postgraduate degree and those who have not.
To cut costs, more students are searching for ways to complete general education requirements before they begin college.
Questioning Value
As college costs continue to rise in 2025, families are struggling – even taking on payment plans for everyday purchases, also known as – to make ends meet.
General education represents about a third of the requirements of a bachelor’s degree and most of an associate degree.
For those who see college as a , general education courses are a . In the past two decades, this – and the increasingly competitive admissions process for college – has contributed to a tenfold increase in and a 50% increase since 2021 in the number of students in . Both programs allow students to complete general education-equivalent courses for free while still in high school.
Complete College America, a nonprofit advocacy group that works with states to increase college completion rates, supports these moves by students and parents, under “gateway courses” to be completed “as soon as possible.”
Other groups promote of credit toward college degrees. This push to complete general education requirements is gaining momentum, despite studies that show Advanced Placement classes, and exams, because these students tend to have more time and resources to devote to AP coursework and also take multiple exams in order to earn college credit.
For college students, general education can offer benefits beyond career attainment.
Understanding the World
While arguments for streamlining college and its costs are evergreen, foundational lessons taught across fields of study are as relevant in 2025 as they were in 1945. The U.S. faces , is , and is adapting to that will change how its residents live and work.
General education gives students broad foundational knowledge that can be used in a variety of careers. By design, it teaches an understanding of the world outside one’s own and how to live in it – a core requirement for a functioning democracy.
This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

Contact
Author:
, professor of Writing and Communication, ɫ Technology
Media Contact:
Shelley Wunder-Smith
shelley.wunder-smith@research.gatech.edu